http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knONJfn7j98
How about 30 seconds of love for David Patten?
https://www.patspropaganda.com/how-about-30-seconds-of-love-for-david-patten/
An Independent Patriots Blog
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knONJfn7j98
How about 30 seconds of love for David Patten?
https://www.patspropaganda.com/how-about-30-seconds-of-love-for-david-patten/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9wfHs5Df0I
Non-musical 2010 Patriots highlights.
These won’t necessarily get you pumped up but it’s always fun reliving some of the best plays from last season.
https://www.patspropaganda.com/non-musical-2010-patriots-highlights-these-wont/
NFL.com Video: Patriots Draft Philosophy
Here’s the video from yesterday’s Path to the Draft where amazingly Charley Casserly pretty much nails the big points of where the Pats stand for this draft, what they need, and who they might look at. As I tweeted last night, even a broken clock is right two times a day.
If the Patriots aren’t an absolute force (not that they aren’t right now, but it’s clear they’re still developing) by 2013 I’ll be shocked. I’m talking a defense that can win games outright. There’s no excuse to have as many picks as the Pats have had, do have and will continue to have, and not build another shutdown defense.
Frenz: Patriots seven round mock
Frenz has a good haul of prospects here, heavy on Wisconsin Badgers and Clemson Tigers, and brings up an interesting prospect (or better yet type of prospect) in Casey Matthews. I’ve wondered if the Pats have been looking at players who might not have the ideal size but might be a little more athletic and Matthews fits that mold.
I think the key thing to drafting a guy like that is if he’s not going to play first and second down he needs to play a lot of special teams. The difference is between guys who are 6-04, 250 and guys who are 6-2, 235 and it might not seem like much, 2 inches, 15 pounds, but in terms of speed and quickness it can be significant.
I’m sure that after the draft is over the Patriots will still have needs and based on this mock I think the leftover need here would still be interior offensive line. But it’s pretty much impossible not to be excited no matter who the Pats add.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QTvNeEsJ1w
Julian Edelman 2009 highlights.
I think a lot of people undervalue Edelman as simply a poor man’s Wes Welker, but he’s actually quite versatile as we saw with him lining up in the backfield occasionally last year. He’s only had two years as an NFL receiver, and despite a few miscues in 2010, I don’t think it’s out of the question to expect big things from Edelman in 2011 in a variety of different roles. Clearly he has the work ethic and talent to become much more of an impact player than just a back up slot receiver.
https://www.patspropaganda.com/julian-edelman-2009-highlights-i-think-a-lot-of/
I remember September 6th, 2009 like it was yesterday. The Patriots were in the midst of cutting down their roster as teams always do over Labor Day weekend, and we were eight days away from kicking off the 2009 season with Tom Brady back behind center.
The Pats looked primed to return to glory after missing the playoffs for the first time since 2002. It is always one of the most exciting times of year for an uber-blogger like myself.
I was sitting in a diner, just about to dig into a monster plate of pancakes when I saw the tweet proclaiming that Richard Seymour had been traded to the Oakland Raiders. Of all the shocking moves BB has made, this one took the pancake.
The list of controversial trades/cuts/picks that BB has made over the years is quite long, and I can’t seem to recount a season without one. Keeping Brady in the starting lineup after Drew Bledsoe was healthy to return was just the innocent (and obvious) start of it.
The trading of Seymour might be the most highly debated personnel move of BB’s career (4th & 2 is the coaching one). From a pragmatic standpoint you can understand why he made did it. You don’t have to agree with it, but the reasoning is clear.
Seymour would’ve walked after 2009 and the Patriots would’ve gotten little more than a compensatory pick for him, maybe a fifth rounder, and it was clear just before the season started that the last remnants of the old guard defense were on their way out.
2009 was really Year One of what I call BBD 2.0.
It would be the first year without Bruschi, Vrabel, and Harrison, the final heart-and-soul pieces of the dynasty. It was time to start building anew.
Would they win another Super Bowl with Seymour in 2009? Maybe. But probably not, not with so much youth and new guys playing key roles. So the page was turned.
When they pulled the trigger on the deal it appeared that the Patriots would be in line for a high first round pick in 2011 from the Raiders, likely with a rookie spending cap in place.
Of course the trade didn’t work out exactly the way we and the Patriots might’ve hoped. I was thinking the first overall pick might not be out of the question. Oh well, they had to pick this to be the one season they didn’t have a losing record. Unacceptable. I hope they fired their head coach.
Still, even without a rookie cap in place at this moment, the 17th pick is still excellent value and should net a very good player or trade value.
But the problem has now become how to you replace the irreplaceable? The trading of Seymour left a major void on the defensive line and now, two seasons laters, you can hardly read anything without the mention of “finding the next Richard Seymour”.
It’s ironic when you consider the fanfare that Seymour received as the sixth overall pick in 2001. I’ll let Ron Borges describe what he saw in Big Sey at the time:
“On a day when they could have had impact players David Terrell or Koren Robinson or the second-best tackle in the draft in Kenyatta Walker, they took Georgia defensive tackle Richard Seymour, who had 1 sack last season in the pass-happy SEC and is too tall to play tackle at 6-6 and too slow to play defensive end"
Hard to believe that this is the same player who must be cloned for the Patriots to ever win another Super Bowl, huh?
I don’t take exception to people stating the need for a dominant defensive end who can play three downs. Believe me, I’m banging that drum as hard as anyone. But every single team in the NFL has that need.
My problem is the belief that finding a carbon copy of Dickie Seymour is the only answer.
If that’s what you think, you’re setting bar at one of the greatest defensive lineman of all time. It would be like saying after Tom Brady retires that we need to find another Tom Brady at quarterback.
Uh, yeah.
This very same thing could be said for Willie McGinest. He’s the bar against which all potential outside linebacker conversion projects are measured now. Everyone has been on an Elephant hunt for the next Willie Mac since 2008, when we realized Adalius Thomas wasn’t the answer.
Great players who are physical freaks don’t come along very often. And if you continue to believe that it’s Hall of Fame freak or bust you’re setting yourself up for severe disappointment.
The approach that needs to be taken is continue adding players who fit the system and coach them up, while giving them some time to make mistakes and progress.
For every high round physical freak who becomes a legend there are just as many free agent cast offs or mid-to-late-to-no round draft picks who flourish in a football-only environment that consistently puts them in position to make an impact.
Dispense with the comparisons. There will never be another Richard Seymour. There might be a player who does some things better and some things worse, but we must let go of the idea that the only way the Patriots defense will be successful is to find Seymour 2.0 and McGinest 2.0.
Where Are the New England Patriots Struggling Most on Defense? New on Bleacher Report from yours truly… The Pats are currently ranked 32nd in the NFL in passes over 20-yards allowed with 42, and they’re tied for 28th in passes allowed over 40-yards with six. The bombs are dropping left and right and the Patriots […]