PatsPropaganda

An Independent Patriots Blog

Patriots Practice Squad Possibilities for 2012 | NEPatriotsDraft.com

by

Patriots Practice Squad Possibilities for 2012 | NEPatriotsDraft.com

Good stuff here from our friends over at NEPatriotsDraft.com. The funny thing about the practice squad is that it’s always easy to project during camp, but then Labor Day weekend hits and there’s a ton of activity and all of sudden you’ve got a bunch of new guys that weren’t even in Patriots camp. Still, there are some promising prospects listed…

by

Nothing gets me more hot and bothered than a defensive depth chart and I always love how Greg Bedard puts his together. It’s not one of those run of the mill/paint by numbers/3-4 defense ones.

Interesting things to point out here is Ninkovich’s move to left end. I’m sure he’ll be standing up sometimes, but it would be a departure from even last year if Pats are less concerned about stopping the run with a big Ty Warren-esque left end?

This is clearly more of a nickel front based on that, but as we’ve been saying all off-season, nickel is the new base. I think the run stopping front seven version of this looks as so:

Fanene-Love-Wilfork-Deaderick

Ninkovich-Spikes-Mayo

Or how about the 3-3-5 front. Something like this maybe:

Fanene-Wilfork-Scott

Hightower-Spikes-Mayo

Question on that one is who comes off, Ninkovich or Hightower?

For the 4-2-5 nickel I think you pull Hightower or Spikes, unless you put Hightower with his hand in the dirt to rush off the left end. Then you pull Ninkovich.

It’s not a direct position battle but there is definitely some role battles between Hightower and Ninkovich. And Carpenter I guess, but I’m really not expecting him to be a big contributor just because he was out there in mini-camp.

(via Setting the depth chart: Defense – Extra Points – Boston.com)

https://www.patspropaganda.com/nothing-gets-me-more-hot-and-bothered-than-a/

by

I’ve never been a part of a team where I’ve hung out more with guys off the field than I have here. Little things like that you can’t take for granted,” Arrington said. ”Not having names on the jerseys was definitely a good thing. You never question Bill. If he does it, it’s defnitely for a reason. I mean, it almost felt like ‘Remember the Titans,’ when they had to write a brief biography on each other. It was one of those moments.

BostonHerald.com – Blogs: The Blitz» Blog Archive » Will we see names on the jerseys for training camp? Or stick with the incognito look?

https://www.patspropaganda.com/ive-never-been-a-part-of-a-team-where-ive-hung/

Random Patriots musings as we count down to camp

by

Here are some things I’ve been thinking about in recent days as we get ready for another run at the Lombardi trophy…

  • I finally rewatched the Super Bowl earlier this week. Yes, I really have to wait until football is right upon us before I can come to terms with yet another horrible finish on a grand stage.
  • Players I was most impressed with in the game upon watching it again: Patrick Chung, Sterling Moore, Brandon Spikes and Danny Woodhead.
  • Moore is almost a lock to me to make the team now. Including his performance in the playoffs he was neck and neck for the best defensive back on the Patriots in 2011 with Arrington. He gets his hands on a lot of balls and clearly is not intimidated in big games. He’s versatile as well, and I’m excited to see what he can do with a full off-season.
  • The media is spinning the Bills and Jets should challenge the Patriots this year but if the Patriots had “the worst defense in the NFL” last year and neither team could overtake them, so what makes anyone think they’ll do it this year? Because I certainly don’t expect the Pats D to be that bad again in 2012.
  • The offensive line is more concerning to me than the secondary right now.
  • The issue that became apparent to me for the Patriots in 2011 could be summed up in execution. On the offensive side it was the “death by a thousand cuts” way of moving the ball.  At times they’d be unstoppable, but when they weren’t clicking they could go cold as they did in crunch time of the Super Bowl. More explosive plays could really help them not be so dependent on continually executing so many plays to move the ball down the field. Brandon Lloyd should help this.
  • Conversely on the defensive side they were the most egregious example of “bend don’t break” in NFL history (per Football Outsiders Almanac). They forced teams to do the same thing they were doing offensively themselves: consistent execution to sustain long drives.
  • Defensively they relied on lesser QBs not being able to put together enough perfectly executed plays to keep up with Brady. It’s almost as if the defensively philosophy came down to “your QB can’t keep up with our QB, so we’re not going to be overly aggressive, we’re going to force you to beat us”.
  • Eli Manning was able to beat us. He executed in crunch time. The Patriots did not. It was there for the taking and we couldn’t take it. It’s just that simple.
  • For all the yards the Patriots gave up in 2011 this philosophy was largely successful. They lost four total games, none by more than eight points.
  • The question is whether or not this philosophy is sustainable as Brady gets older?
  • Ultimately the point is that it doesn’t need to always be this hard. If the Pats offense is able to challenge the outside and deep portions of the field better, along with some more explosiveness from the young running backs it should help them move the ball quicker and require less dependence on consistent execution.
  • This will also help the defense, but I don’t know if we can ever expect a Belichick defense to be overly aggressive and attacking. The Pats were 5th in the NFL rushing just 3 defenders, 15th rushing 4, 27th rushing 5.
  • Still, if you have better players you can rush fewer of them and still get pressure and force mistakes. That’s the key for them as I see it.

by

If you take Lloyd’s numbers when playing under Josh McDaniels (average of 4.74 catches per game; 78.9 yards per game), you could project a 75-catch, 1,262-yard season if he plays all 16 regular-season games. If you want to factor in Tom Brady is throwing him the ball this year – and there are a lot of other weapons on the field that defenses must account for – it could be reason to increase that projection.

Patriots Mailbag: How will the defense be different? – ESPN Boston

https://www.patspropaganda.com/if-you-take-lloyds-numbers-when-playing-under/

Patriots Mailbag: How will the defense be different? – ESPN Boston

by

Patriots Mailbag: How will the defense be different? – ESPN Boston

Bill Belichick has seemingly altered his value system for defensive personnel. In the past, it is my opinion that Belichick viewed prospects through the lens of the 3-4 defense and the two-part question that would be asked of a potential first-round draft choice was “Where does he fit in the 3-4 and can he also help on third down?” These days, because the game is so spread out and the Patriots are in sub packages more than the base 3-4 (63 percent to 34 percent in 2011 regular season), a player who projects to a sub role has a greater value than he might have had five years ago when the statistics were probably flipped. The 3-4 isn’t as important and athletic players who can play in space have greater value. I think this is the first year Belichick’s draft approach reflects that he’s on board with that line of thinking. The third-down defense was 28th in the NFL last year and 32nd two years ago.