Early season loss leaves Patriots at familiar crossroads – WEEI | Christopher Price
Early season loss leaves Patriots at familiar crossroads – WEEI | Christopher Price
Fun historical context read from Chris Price. Love stuff like this!!
Now it appears the 2013 Patriots are at a similar intersection, one that will determine whether or not they are tough enough – both physically and mentally – to be a success. Can they use an early season setback to pave the way for a run through the second half of the regular season? Or is the letdown part of a larger problem that could dog this team throughout the rest of the year? One thing that certainly distinguishes the current edition from previous years is that you can argue – as Brady did on Monday – that New England’s No. 1 offense has yet to be on the field. The fact that the Patriots will get their two best running backs in Stevan Ridley and Shane Vereen on the field sooner rather than later, while tight end Rob Gronkowski continues to make progress from an offseason that was filled with surgeries. That alone should provide a boost to an offense that’s been sluggish for much of the first five games of the season. But it’s one thing to get a much-needed infusion of talent on the offensive side of the ball – it’s another thing to have those players be able to execute the game plan on a consistent basis.
Tough day for what has typically been a solid unit. The Bengals blitzed 14 times, but the Patriots offensive line appeared to be overwhelmed from the start. … Solder, who has been solid all year, gave up two sacks on the first series, three hurries and was responsible for one bad run. It looks like he missed his assignment on the first sack, as Geno Atkins was given a free pass to Brady.
https://www.patspropaganda.com/tough-day-for-what-has-typically-been-a-solid/
Bill Belichick Conference Call Transcript
Bill Belichick Conference Call Transcript
Q: So you have to get lined up, you can’t be playing games and trying to disguise?
BB: I’d say that’s pretty accurate. You have to be careful about trying to do too much with him. You better be able to get to what you have, which does mean that a lot of times you have to show what you’re in, in order to match up against their different looks because they create a lot of different formationing and like I said, detaching the tight end, detaching the backs, they use a lot of different personnel groups with the multiple tight ends – all their backs play, all their tight ends play, all their receivers play. They run them in and out of there in a hurry. Then get lined up and get to go, you have to be ready to play when the ball is snapped because he does a very good job of, when the defense, when they miss somebody, he finds them. They get a bunch of plays every week on I would say, defensive mistakes or alignment errors that he recognizes and just gets the ball to whoever it is and then you’re chasing him. That’s a big challenge.
Thank You for Not Coaching! Week 5 – The Triangle Blog – Grantland
Thank You for Not Coaching! Week 5 – The Triangle Blog – Grantland
Not sure how much easier it would’ve been to kick a field goal in said monsoon…
The Patriots kick a field goal on fourth-and-goal from the 1-yard line down 10 points in the fourth quarter. This was a very similar decision to Mike Smith’s call from Week 4, when he took a field goal on fourth-and-1 from the 6-yard line against the Patriots that turned a 10-point game into a seven-point one. Here, Bill Belichick faced fourth-and-goal from the 1-yard line against the Bengals, and he made the same call: kick a field goal and go down seven. Some of the facts regarding those two decisions are the same. Others affect the choices at hand. The biggest difference was that Belichick made his call with 6:30 left in the game, while Smith’s came with 3:00 left. With the extra time, Belichick’s team would theoretically have more time to move the ball down the field and produce the extra yardage it needed on the subsequent drive for the touchdown, which seems to make the early field goal a better option. On the other hand, if Smith went for it and failed last week down 10 points, his game was over. Belichick could have gone for it here, failed, and still had a shot at scoring on two more possessions to win the game. That’s a friendlier fallback plan in the case of failure. In a contest where yards and points were harder to come by, Belichick had to know that it would be harder to score a touchdown on any future possession than it would be from the 1-yard line, even with Cincinnati’s great defense. And, of course, going for it and succeeding on this possession was Belichick’s best shot at actually winning the game over the next two drives; a field goal and a touchdown would only take him and the Patriots to overtime. What he might not have known is that the skies were about to open up. New England kicked the field goal and eventually got the ball back on Cincinnati’s 44-yard line after a fumble with 3:26 left, but by then, monsoon-like conditions had taken over in Cincinnati. The weather was so bad that Tom Brady completed only one of his nine subsequent passes the rest of the way, and the Patriots never seriously threatened to tie. I can’t fault Belichick for failing to prepare for the incoming storm, but his conservative call to kick from the 1-yard line really hurt his team’s chances of winning the game in any weather.
Greg Bedard’s Week 5 Decisive Moments in the NFL | The MMQB with Peter King
Greg Bedard’s Week 5 Decisive Moments in the NFL | The MMQB with Peter King
Said it yesterday that this was the turning point in the game, glad to see Bedard broke it down for us. Great stuff, except for the part with the Patriots defense being unprepared. Derp…
After reviewing the coaches’ film from NFL Game Rewind, it’s still difficult to tell what coverage the Patriots were supposed to be playing—that’s how unprepared they were at the snap. It appears that all of the Patriots’ defensive backs were out of position: cornerbacks Aqib Talib (31), Alfonso Dennard (37), Kyle Arrington (25) and safeties Devin McCourty (32) and Steve Gregory (28). Dennard was in the middle of the field at the snap but recovered nicely. There are three explanations for the play. Either the Patriots were in quarters coverage (the three cornerbacks and McCourty split the deep part of the field into quarters) with Gregory playing a robber or lurker position (he’s a free player looking to read and rob the quarterback in the middle of the field); the Patriots were playing two-deep safeties with man coverage underneath; or the Patriots were playing man free with a robber (man coverage underneath one deep safety).